Friday, July 2, 2010
Testing comestic with animals
实验动物关怀小组.台湾动物之声
兔子用于化妆品测试，这些实验是必要的吗？ (照片：PETA)
大部份的人都不知道他们的「樱桃红」唇膏是用动物的痛苦换来的。 化妆品因为人体长期使用与接触，必须确保不会有刺激性、毒性以及变异的反应，所以，制造厂通常是以动物实验来证实安全无虞，然后才进入人体临床实验。 现今的动物实验是极为残酷而不得要领的，为了化妆品及其他非生存必需品所做的动物实验是极不道德的。而且，动物实验的结果，从来就没有阻止任何产品问世。
不必要的残酷实验
「Draize眼睛刺激性测试」，是用来衡量某种产品可能对人类眼睛的刺激程度。兔子，总是被拿来做这种测试的动物，因为他们没有泪水，所以不会因为 泪水把测试物质从他们的眼中冲洗掉。这些兔子们一只只被锁住并绑起来，他们的下眼睑被拉开，滴入测试物质，然后他们的眼睛立刻被人强迫紧闭，好让测试物质 的刺激性达到最强。像这样的测试物质甚至包括洗洁剂、发胶及指甲油。
Most people do not know their "cherry red" lipstick is the suffering of animals in return. Cosmetics and contact long-term use because the body must ensure that no irritation, toxicity, and variability of response, so manufacturers are usually based on animal experiments to prove safe and secure before entering human clinical trials. Present in animals is extremely cruel and discursive, to cosmetics and other non-necessities to survive doing animal experiments is extremely immoral. Moreover, the results of animal experiments, has never prevented any products come out.
Unnecessarily cruel experiments
"Draize eye irritation test", is used to measure a product may stimulate the human eye level. Rabbits, always to be used as such a test animal, because they do not tear, so the test material will not tear from their eyes washed out. The rabbits were locked and the only one tied up, their eyelids were opened, the trickle-down test material, and then they were forced to shut the eye immediately, so that test substances irritating to most. Test material like this and even detergent, hair gel and nail polish
进行Draize测试的兔子 (照片：PETA)
「Draize测试」发明于1944年，使用至今而无任何改变。科学上许多实验方法只是因为「习惯」，缺乏动力去发展或使用更人道且科学的方法， 「Draize测试」是诸多此类实验之一。许许多多的兔子因为痛苦挣扎而折断了脖子，而受过测试的兔子所得到的痛苦包括眼睛刺痛、溃烂、出血而至失明。他 们得不到任何医疗，而在实验结束后，所有的兔子，不论健康与否，全部都会被杀死。
「皮肤刺激性测试」，则是观察某种测试物质可能对人类皮肤的影响。而兔子仍是最常被拿来做实验的一种动物。人们将动物一部份的毛皮剃光，然后擦上测试 物质。当动物们的皮肤发炎或破皮溃烂，实验结果就会被记录下来。同样的，在实验结束后，所有的动物都会被杀 死。
「LD50」，长久以来一直是测试物质是否有毒的标准实验。这种实验最常用到的动物是－－老鼠，每一种测试总是要用到上百只动物。测试的方法包括强迫 喂食或直接用管子插入胃中，有时则是用皮下注射或是强迫性吸入。按每种测试物质的不同，动物们会产生许多不同的病症，其中包括惊挛、呕吐、腹泻、瘫痪、甚 至七孔流血。直到一半（50%，故名LD50）的动物死亡后，实验才会结束，而幸存的动物也一样会被杀死。
这些实验是必要的吗？
"Draize test" was invented in 1944, is still in use without any changes. Science of many experimental methods only because "habit", the lack of incentive to develop or use a more humane and scientific methods, "Draize test" is one of many such experiments. Many rabbits as struggling and broken his neck, while those obtained by testing the rabbit eye irritation including pain, ulceration, bleeding, to the blind. They do not have any medical, and in the end of the experiment, all rabbits, whether healthy or not, all will be killed.
"Skin irritation test" is the observation of a test substance may affect the human skin. The rabbit is still the most commonly used as an experimental animal. It will be a part of the animal's fur shaved, and then rub on the test material. When the animals skin inflammation cracked or open sores, the experimental results will be recorded. Similarly, in the end of the experiment, all animals would be killed.
"LD50", has long been a standard test substance is toxic experiment. This most commonly used experimental animals - mice, each test is always to use the hundreds of animals. Test methods include forced feeding tube into the stomach or directly, and sometimes are forced by subcutaneous injection or inhalation. Each test material by different animals produce many different symptoms, including panic Luan, vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, or even seven-hole bleeding. Up to half (50%, hence the name LD50) of the animals died, the experiment will end, while the surviving animals will be killed too.
These experiments are necessary?
解决之道：仁慈心结合科技
替代实验：「Eytex」（一种用豆类制成的物品）以及「Skintex」（一种用南瓜皮制成的物品），可以拿来做5000种有毒物质的体外测试。除 了能使兔子及其他的动物免于痛楚及折磨，「Eytex」及「Skintex」也具有极高的经济效益，因为它们只需动物实验一半的花费，并且还能得到更客观 的统计资料，而不是只由兔子红肿发炎的眼睛作主观的判断。
另一类替代实验则是使用「Testskin」－－一种用人类细胞在人体外培植而作成的人造皮肤。这种人造皮肤可用来测量皮肤受刺激的程度、吸收的状 况、日晒的伤害，以及乳液、除皱面霜、放晒用品、肥皂及洗发精对皮肤的影响。「Testskin」也同时用做烧伤病患皮肤移植之用。
除了动物实验外，许多其他的实验方法也都能测试新产品。拜高科技所赐，未来这些其他的实验将能彻底取代动物实验，但是首先，必须有市场需求及经济效 益，才能得到充裕的资金作进一步的研究。
并且，只有人们不再购买、使用动物实验的产品，制造商们才会停止使用动物实验。在人们停止购买之前，这些厂商仍会持续用残酷而不人道的动物实验，来换 取他们的利益。当你购买非动物实验的产品时，一个强烈人道的声音就能传到社会中。请大家支持「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）－－不再使用动物实验的产品。
The solution: combination of kind heart and Technology
Alternative test: "Eytex" (a kind items made with beans) and "Skintex" (a kind items made with pumpkin skin), can be used to do 5,000 in vitro testing of toxic substances. In addition to rabbits and other animals can be free from pain and suffering, "Eytex" and "Skintex" also has a very high cost, because they are only half the cost of animal experiments, and can be more objective statistical information, not only by the inflamed rabbit eye for subjective judgments.
Another alternative is to use experimental "Testskin" - a kind of using human cells cultivated outside the body and made of artificial skin. Such artificial skin could be used to measure the degree of skin irritation and absorption conditions, sun damage, and the emulsion, wrinkle creams, drying up supplies, soap and shampoo on the skin. "Testskin" also used skin transplantation in burn patients.
In addition to animal experiments, many other experimental methods can test new products. Thanks to high tech to sink in, the future of these other experiments will be able to completely replace animal experiments, but first there must be market demand and economic benefits, to get sufficient funds for further research.
Also, only people no longer buy, use animal products, manufacturers will stop using animal experiments. Before the people stop buying, these companies will continue to use cruel and inhumane animal experiments, in exchange for their interests. When you buy non-animal products, a strong voice of humane societies can be reached. Please support "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) - no longer use animal products.
哪些化妆品不用动物实验？ 在台湾，法令上把化妆品分为二种：一为含有医疗或毒剧药品化妆品（简称含药化妆品），否则列为一般化妆品。（注一）依我国法 令，一般化妆品虽然没有规定须经动物实验，但是由于化妆品原料大都来自进口，而消费者还不具有动保意识，因此厂商并没有刻意选择免于动物实验的化妆品原 料。另外，含药化妆品则不论为输入或国产，均须向卫生署办理查验登记（其中须附有多种动物实验报告），经核准发给许可证后始得输入或制售。
The solution: combination of kind heart and Technology
Alternative test: "Eytex" (a kind items made with beans) and "Skintex" (a kind items made with pumpkin skin), can be used to do 5,000 in vitro testing of toxic substances. In addition to rabbits and other animals can be free from pain and suffering, "Eytex" and "Skintex" also has a very high cost, because they are only half the cost of animal experiments, and can be more objective statistical information, not only by the inflamed rabbit eye for subjective judgments.
Another alternative is to use experimental "Testskin" - a kind of using human cells cultivated outside the body and made of artificial skin. Such artificial skin could be used to measure the degree of skin irritation and absorption conditions, sun damage, and the emulsion, wrinkle creams, drying up supplies, soap and shampoo on the skin. "Testskin" also used skin transplantation in burn patients.
In addition to animal experiments, many other experimental methods can test new products. Thanks to high tech to sink in, the future of these other experiments will be able to completely replace animal experiments, but first there must be market demand and economic benefits, to get sufficient funds for further research.
Also, only people no longer buy, use animal products, manufacturers will stop using animal experiments. Before the people stop buying, these companies will continue to use cruel and inhumane animal experiments, in exchange for their interests. When you buy non-animal products, a strong voice of humane societies can be reached. Please support "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) - no longer use animal products.
换言之，消费者若要选择「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）的化妆品，只好选择属于一般化妆品的外国品牌了。为了让爱美又仁慈的女性（或男性）朋友们有「人道」选择的机会，本会特地搜集在台湾上市之 化妆品品牌，并根据PETA（美国人道对待动物协会）所提供的资料，一一比对之后拟出「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）的化妆品品牌。
以下所列出的美容、保养、化妆品品牌或公司，乃经过PETA之所认证，不论在原料、制程或成品……各方面皆没有使用动物实验，也未委托给任何机构做动 物实验。这些「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）的美容商品，在台湾也都买得到：
In other words, consumers to choose "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) cosmetic, to choose to belong to the foreign cosmetics brand in general. In order to make another kind of beauty of women (or men) friends, the "humane" choice, this will be collected specifically listed cosmetics brand in Taiwan, and according to PETA (American Humane Treatment of Animals) the information provided, 11 After the prepared than "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) cosmetics brand.
Listed below are beauty, care, cosmetics, brand or company, is the culmination of PETA 之 authenticated, both in raw materials, manufacturing process or finished goods ... ... Ge respects Mei You use animals experiments are not appointed to any body of some animal experiments. The "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) beauty products, in Taiwan you can buy them:
Body Shop美体小铺、Revlon露华浓、Chanel香奈儿、Avon雅芳、Aveda肯梦、Mary Kay玫琳凯、Clinique倩碧、Yardley雅礼、NuSkin如新、Decleor思妍丽、Clarins de Paris克兰诗、Estee lauder雅诗兰黛、Bobbi Brown芭比波朗、Eureka雪俐、Dr. Hauschka德国世家、Orlane幽兰、Aramis雅男士、Origins品木宣言、Nature shop自然小铺、Hard Candy硬头甜心、Kiehl’s契尔氏、Nutri-Metics新姿美缇、Crabtree ＆ Eyelyn瑰珀翠、Stila、M.A.C.、Pure destiny、Urban Decay、Paul Mitchell、Tommy Hilfiger、Essential Oil、Weleda、H2O Plus。
相对的另一方面，本会也列举使用动物实验之化妆品厂牌，希望透过消费者的觉醒，促使这些厂商能够放弃不必要的动物实验，改用不伤生害命的替代方法（已 经发明出很多了）来测试化妆品的安全性。请大家避免使用这些「残酷商品」－－因为，使用它们，一点都不美丽：
In contrast the other hand, will also cite the use of animals in this experiment cosmetics brand, the awakening of hope consumers to promote these companies to give up unnecessary animal experiments, switch over to alternative injured students Haiming (already invented a lot of) to test the safety of cosmetics. Please avoid using such "brutal commodity" - because, to use them, not the beautiful thing:
Shiseido资生堂、Johnson Johnson娇生、L’Oreal欧莱雅、Lancome兰蔻、Olay欧蕾、Vidal Sassoon沙宣、SKⅡ、Ponds旁氏、Polar宝露、Nov娜芙、Max Factor蜜丝佛陀、Lancaster兰佳斯、Sally Hansen莎莉、Cover Girl封面女郎、佳丽宝、花王、狮王、欣兰、Neoteric、Mennen、Noxell，以及台湾、日本制造之化妆品品牌。
------要美丽，不必残忍！
注一：含药化妆品与一般化妆品之区别在于：一般化妆品包括香水及修饰用化妆品，如粉底、粉饼、粉膏、修容饼、眼影、眼线、胭脂、眉笔、睫毛膏、唇膏等；或 不含有医疗或毒剧药品之化妆品（洗发精）、头发用化妆品（发油）、面霜等均属之。含药化妆品则包括：染发剂、烫发剂、及含有卫生署公告之「化妆品含有医疗 或毒剧药品基准」之成分，其含量以不超过该基准者为范围（含量超出基准者则以药品管理）；若其效能宣称防止黑斑、雀斑、皱纹、及去头皮屑等内容者，亦列入 含药化妆品管理。
我想知，动物何罪?点解可以咁样对佢地?佢地都系有生命架..点解要咁残忍?连我睇既人都为佢留泪，点解d人可以做得出呢d咁讨厌既事?
转贴只某论坛
兔子用于化妆品测试，这些实验是必要的吗？ (照片：PETA)
大部份的人都不知道他们的「樱桃红」唇膏是用动物的痛苦换来的。 化妆品因为人体长期使用与接触，必须确保不会有刺激性、毒性以及变异的反应，所以，制造厂通常是以动物实验来证实安全无虞，然后才进入人体临床实验。 现今的动物实验是极为残酷而不得要领的，为了化妆品及其他非生存必需品所做的动物实验是极不道德的。而且，动物实验的结果，从来就没有阻止任何产品问世。
不必要的残酷实验
「Draize眼睛刺激性测试」，是用来衡量某种产品可能对人类眼睛的刺激程度。兔子，总是被拿来做这种测试的动物，因为他们没有泪水，所以不会因为 泪水把测试物质从他们的眼中冲洗掉。这些兔子们一只只被锁住并绑起来，他们的下眼睑被拉开，滴入测试物质，然后他们的眼睛立刻被人强迫紧闭，好让测试物质 的刺激性达到最强。像这样的测试物质甚至包括洗洁剂、发胶及指甲油。
Most people do not know their "cherry red" lipstick is the suffering of animals in return. Cosmetics and contact long-term use because the body must ensure that no irritation, toxicity, and variability of response, so manufacturers are usually based on animal experiments to prove safe and secure before entering human clinical trials. Present in animals is extremely cruel and discursive, to cosmetics and other non-necessities to survive doing animal experiments is extremely immoral. Moreover, the results of animal experiments, has never prevented any products come out.
Unnecessarily cruel experiments
"Draize eye irritation test", is used to measure a product may stimulate the human eye level. Rabbits, always to be used as such a test animal, because they do not tear, so the test material will not tear from their eyes washed out. The rabbits were locked and the only one tied up, their eyelids were opened, the trickle-down test material, and then they were forced to shut the eye immediately, so that test substances irritating to most. Test material like this and even detergent, hair gel and nail polish
进行Draize测试的兔子 (照片：PETA)
「Draize测试」发明于1944年，使用至今而无任何改变。科学上许多实验方法只是因为「习惯」，缺乏动力去发展或使用更人道且科学的方法， 「Draize测试」是诸多此类实验之一。许许多多的兔子因为痛苦挣扎而折断了脖子，而受过测试的兔子所得到的痛苦包括眼睛刺痛、溃烂、出血而至失明。他 们得不到任何医疗，而在实验结束后，所有的兔子，不论健康与否，全部都会被杀死。
「皮肤刺激性测试」，则是观察某种测试物质可能对人类皮肤的影响。而兔子仍是最常被拿来做实验的一种动物。人们将动物一部份的毛皮剃光，然后擦上测试 物质。当动物们的皮肤发炎或破皮溃烂，实验结果就会被记录下来。同样的，在实验结束后，所有的动物都会被杀 死。
「LD50」，长久以来一直是测试物质是否有毒的标准实验。这种实验最常用到的动物是－－老鼠，每一种测试总是要用到上百只动物。测试的方法包括强迫 喂食或直接用管子插入胃中，有时则是用皮下注射或是强迫性吸入。按每种测试物质的不同，动物们会产生许多不同的病症，其中包括惊挛、呕吐、腹泻、瘫痪、甚 至七孔流血。直到一半（50%，故名LD50）的动物死亡后，实验才会结束，而幸存的动物也一样会被杀死。
这些实验是必要的吗？
"Draize test" was invented in 1944, is still in use without any changes. Science of many experimental methods only because "habit", the lack of incentive to develop or use a more humane and scientific methods, "Draize test" is one of many such experiments. Many rabbits as struggling and broken his neck, while those obtained by testing the rabbit eye irritation including pain, ulceration, bleeding, to the blind. They do not have any medical, and in the end of the experiment, all rabbits, whether healthy or not, all will be killed.
"Skin irritation test" is the observation of a test substance may affect the human skin. The rabbit is still the most commonly used as an experimental animal. It will be a part of the animal's fur shaved, and then rub on the test material. When the animals skin inflammation cracked or open sores, the experimental results will be recorded. Similarly, in the end of the experiment, all animals would be killed.
"LD50", has long been a standard test substance is toxic experiment. This most commonly used experimental animals - mice, each test is always to use the hundreds of animals. Test methods include forced feeding tube into the stomach or directly, and sometimes are forced by subcutaneous injection or inhalation. Each test material by different animals produce many different symptoms, including panic Luan, vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, or even seven-hole bleeding. Up to half (50%, hence the name LD50) of the animals died, the experiment will end, while the surviving animals will be killed too.
These experiments are necessary?
解决之道：仁慈心结合科技
替代实验：「Eytex」（一种用豆类制成的物品）以及「Skintex」（一种用南瓜皮制成的物品），可以拿来做5000种有毒物质的体外测试。除 了能使兔子及其他的动物免于痛楚及折磨，「Eytex」及「Skintex」也具有极高的经济效益，因为它们只需动物实验一半的花费，并且还能得到更客观 的统计资料，而不是只由兔子红肿发炎的眼睛作主观的判断。
另一类替代实验则是使用「Testskin」－－一种用人类细胞在人体外培植而作成的人造皮肤。这种人造皮肤可用来测量皮肤受刺激的程度、吸收的状 况、日晒的伤害，以及乳液、除皱面霜、放晒用品、肥皂及洗发精对皮肤的影响。「Testskin」也同时用做烧伤病患皮肤移植之用。
除了动物实验外，许多其他的实验方法也都能测试新产品。拜高科技所赐，未来这些其他的实验将能彻底取代动物实验，但是首先，必须有市场需求及经济效 益，才能得到充裕的资金作进一步的研究。
并且，只有人们不再购买、使用动物实验的产品，制造商们才会停止使用动物实验。在人们停止购买之前，这些厂商仍会持续用残酷而不人道的动物实验，来换 取他们的利益。当你购买非动物实验的产品时，一个强烈人道的声音就能传到社会中。请大家支持「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）－－不再使用动物实验的产品。
The solution: combination of kind heart and Technology
Alternative test: "Eytex" (a kind items made with beans) and "Skintex" (a kind items made with pumpkin skin), can be used to do 5,000 in vitro testing of toxic substances. In addition to rabbits and other animals can be free from pain and suffering, "Eytex" and "Skintex" also has a very high cost, because they are only half the cost of animal experiments, and can be more objective statistical information, not only by the inflamed rabbit eye for subjective judgments.
Another alternative is to use experimental "Testskin" - a kind of using human cells cultivated outside the body and made of artificial skin. Such artificial skin could be used to measure the degree of skin irritation and absorption conditions, sun damage, and the emulsion, wrinkle creams, drying up supplies, soap and shampoo on the skin. "Testskin" also used skin transplantation in burn patients.
In addition to animal experiments, many other experimental methods can test new products. Thanks to high tech to sink in, the future of these other experiments will be able to completely replace animal experiments, but first there must be market demand and economic benefits, to get sufficient funds for further research.
Also, only people no longer buy, use animal products, manufacturers will stop using animal experiments. Before the people stop buying, these companies will continue to use cruel and inhumane animal experiments, in exchange for their interests. When you buy non-animal products, a strong voice of humane societies can be reached. Please support "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) - no longer use animal products.
哪些化妆品不用动物实验？ 在台湾，法令上把化妆品分为二种：一为含有医疗或毒剧药品化妆品（简称含药化妆品），否则列为一般化妆品。（注一）依我国法 令，一般化妆品虽然没有规定须经动物实验，但是由于化妆品原料大都来自进口，而消费者还不具有动保意识，因此厂商并没有刻意选择免于动物实验的化妆品原 料。另外，含药化妆品则不论为输入或国产，均须向卫生署办理查验登记（其中须附有多种动物实验报告），经核准发给许可证后始得输入或制售。
The solution: combination of kind heart and Technology
Alternative test: "Eytex" (a kind items made with beans) and "Skintex" (a kind items made with pumpkin skin), can be used to do 5,000 in vitro testing of toxic substances. In addition to rabbits and other animals can be free from pain and suffering, "Eytex" and "Skintex" also has a very high cost, because they are only half the cost of animal experiments, and can be more objective statistical information, not only by the inflamed rabbit eye for subjective judgments.
Another alternative is to use experimental "Testskin" - a kind of using human cells cultivated outside the body and made of artificial skin. Such artificial skin could be used to measure the degree of skin irritation and absorption conditions, sun damage, and the emulsion, wrinkle creams, drying up supplies, soap and shampoo on the skin. "Testskin" also used skin transplantation in burn patients.
In addition to animal experiments, many other experimental methods can test new products. Thanks to high tech to sink in, the future of these other experiments will be able to completely replace animal experiments, but first there must be market demand and economic benefits, to get sufficient funds for further research.
Also, only people no longer buy, use animal products, manufacturers will stop using animal experiments. Before the people stop buying, these companies will continue to use cruel and inhumane animal experiments, in exchange for their interests. When you buy non-animal products, a strong voice of humane societies can be reached. Please support "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) - no longer use animal products.
换言之，消费者若要选择「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）的化妆品，只好选择属于一般化妆品的外国品牌了。为了让爱美又仁慈的女性（或男性）朋友们有「人道」选择的机会，本会特地搜集在台湾上市之 化妆品品牌，并根据PETA（美国人道对待动物协会）所提供的资料，一一比对之后拟出「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）的化妆品品牌。
以下所列出的美容、保养、化妆品品牌或公司，乃经过PETA之所认证，不论在原料、制程或成品……各方面皆没有使用动物实验，也未委托给任何机构做动 物实验。这些「免于残酷」（Cruelty free）的美容商品，在台湾也都买得到：
In other words, consumers to choose "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) cosmetic, to choose to belong to the foreign cosmetics brand in general. In order to make another kind of beauty of women (or men) friends, the "humane" choice, this will be collected specifically listed cosmetics brand in Taiwan, and according to PETA (American Humane Treatment of Animals) the information provided, 11 After the prepared than "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) cosmetics brand.
Listed below are beauty, care, cosmetics, brand or company, is the culmination of PETA 之 authenticated, both in raw materials, manufacturing process or finished goods ... ... Ge respects Mei You use animals experiments are not appointed to any body of some animal experiments. The "freedom from cruel" (Cruelty free) beauty products, in Taiwan you can buy them:
Body Shop美体小铺、Revlon露华浓、Chanel香奈儿、Avon雅芳、Aveda肯梦、Mary Kay玫琳凯、Clinique倩碧、Yardley雅礼、NuSkin如新、Decleor思妍丽、Clarins de Paris克兰诗、Estee lauder雅诗兰黛、Bobbi Brown芭比波朗、Eureka雪俐、Dr. Hauschka德国世家、Orlane幽兰、Aramis雅男士、Origins品木宣言、Nature shop自然小铺、Hard Candy硬头甜心、Kiehl’s契尔氏、Nutri-Metics新姿美缇、Crabtree ＆ Eyelyn瑰珀翠、Stila、M.A.C.、Pure destiny、Urban Decay、Paul Mitchell、Tommy Hilfiger、Essential Oil、Weleda、H2O Plus。
相对的另一方面，本会也列举使用动物实验之化妆品厂牌，希望透过消费者的觉醒，促使这些厂商能够放弃不必要的动物实验，改用不伤生害命的替代方法（已 经发明出很多了）来测试化妆品的安全性。请大家避免使用这些「残酷商品」－－因为，使用它们，一点都不美丽：
In contrast the other hand, will also cite the use of animals in this experiment cosmetics brand, the awakening of hope consumers to promote these companies to give up unnecessary animal experiments, switch over to alternative injured students Haiming (already invented a lot of) to test the safety of cosmetics. Please avoid using such "brutal commodity" - because, to use them, not the beautiful thing:
Shiseido资生堂、Johnson Johnson娇生、L’Oreal欧莱雅、Lancome兰蔻、Olay欧蕾、Vidal Sassoon沙宣、SKⅡ、Ponds旁氏、Polar宝露、Nov娜芙、Max Factor蜜丝佛陀、Lancaster兰佳斯、Sally Hansen莎莉、Cover Girl封面女郎、佳丽宝、花王、狮王、欣兰、Neoteric、Mennen、Noxell，以及台湾、日本制造之化妆品品牌。
------要美丽，不必残忍！
注一：含药化妆品与一般化妆品之区别在于：一般化妆品包括香水及修饰用化妆品，如粉底、粉饼、粉膏、修容饼、眼影、眼线、胭脂、眉笔、睫毛膏、唇膏等；或 不含有医疗或毒剧药品之化妆品（洗发精）、头发用化妆品（发油）、面霜等均属之。含药化妆品则包括：染发剂、烫发剂、及含有卫生署公告之「化妆品含有医疗 或毒剧药品基准」之成分，其含量以不超过该基准者为范围（含量超出基准者则以药品管理）；若其效能宣称防止黑斑、雀斑、皱纹、及去头皮屑等内容者，亦列入 含药化妆品管理。
我想知，动物何罪?点解可以咁样对佢地?佢地都系有生命架..点解要咁残忍?连我睇既人都为佢留泪，点解d人可以做得出呢d咁讨厌既事?
转贴只某论坛
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
